The Colombo High Court has postponed further hearings in the controversial “Krrish” project case involving Parliamentarian Namal Rajapaksa until May 29.
The case was taken up today (23) before Colombo High Court Judge Nadee Aparna Suwandurugoda, with Namal Rajapaksa appearing before court during the proceedings.
The legal action has been filed by the Attorney General under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, alleging that Rajapaksa accepted Rs. 70 million from the Indian company “Krrish” under the pretext of promoting rugby in Sri Lanka.
According to the prosecution, the funds in question are linked to financial transactions associated with the controversial Krrish real estate project, which drew significant public and political attention several years ago.
Following today’s proceedings, the High Court decided to adjourn the matter and fixed May 29 as the next hearing date.
The Krrish project became one of Sri Lanka’s most discussed investment controversies after large-scale development plans proposed in Colombo faced delays, disputes, and allegations surrounding financial irregularities. The project initially promised major investment opportunities and luxury infrastructure developments in the country.
Over the years, the case has remained politically sensitive due to the involvement of prominent political figures and allegations connected to financial transparency and accountability. Legal analysts say the proceedings are being closely watched because of their potential political and legal implications.
The case against Namal Rajapaksa is also part of a broader national focus on financial crime investigations, anti-corruption measures, and money laundering-related cases involving high-profile individuals in Sri Lanka.
Political observers note that such cases continue to attract strong public attention as Sri Lanka faces growing demands for transparency, accountability, and stronger enforcement of financial regulations.
Meanwhile, supporters of Namal Rajapaksa have repeatedly denied the allegations and maintain that the accusations are politically motivated.
What happens next will depend on the upcoming court proceedings scheduled for May 29, where further submissions and legal arguments are expected to be presented before the Colombo High Court.
The outcome of the case could carry broader significance for ongoing discussions surrounding governance, financial oversight, and political accountability in Sri Lanka.
